Stakeholder Objectives — Misalignment, Side Quests and Invalid Goals

What this simulation shows

In No Hiding Place, Bob Ferris has one objective: reach the evening without learning the England score, so he can watch Match of the Day as though it were live. To do that he must survive an entire day of newspapers, radios, conversations, pubs and churchgoers.

Almost nobody he meets shares his objective, and the simulation separates the reasons why into three distinct failure modes.

Misaligned objectives. The one-legged newspaper seller bellows the headline score because he wants to sell papers. The radio presenter broadcasts the news because that is the job. None of them are against Bob; they are simply indifferent, optimising for something else while he stands too close to transactions that have nothing to do with him. This is the failure that stakeholder-alignment advice actually addresses — align the incentives and the indifference stops mattering.

Competing side quests. Terry wants the same thing Bob wants, and is the biggest threat in the episode. He dangles the possibility that he already knows, threatens to blurt it out, and manufactures tension purely because tormenting Bob is more fun than helping him. His stated objective is genuine. Another incentive simply outranks it in the moment. This is the harder problem, and no amount of alignment work touches it, because there is nothing to align.

Objective validity. Bob wins. He reaches the evening with his ignorance intact — and then discovers the match was postponed. There was never a score to protect.

How to use it

Move Bob between locations — the Street, the Pub, the Station, the TV Shop, the Church, Terry’s Flat — and watch the Objective tensions panel as each encounter resolves. Each one is labelled with which of the three modes it is testing.

Play it twice deliberately. First, treat every threat identically, as Bob does: avoid everything. You can win this way, and the Commentary will tell you how narrowly. Then play it distinguishing the modes — handle indifferent parties differently from Terry — and notice that the second approach costs less and is more robust, because you are not spending the same effort on people who merely happen to be nearby.

Then read the result. The endgame is the same either way, which is the point the simulation is actually making.

What to take away

A product manager’s job is not only aligning objectives. That solves the newsseller problem, not the Terry problem. The harder task is spotting when somebody who genuinely shares your goal is still working against it because an unspoken incentive is quietly in charge — the team relitigating a settled architecture decision, the executive slow-walking a proposal that shrinks a rival’s headcount.

And the third failure mode outranks both. You can manage every stakeholder perfectly, outlast the indifferent, out-manoeuvre the conflicted, and still ship on time into a market that moved on months ago. Before spending the whole day on it, it is worth checking that the thing you are protecting still exists.

Back to Simulations